Talk:XFS Status Updates: Difference between revisions
Add topicNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= quite/quiet = | |||
Someone's annoyingly dyslexic: | Someone's annoyingly dyslexic: | ||
"quite" == totally/actually; | "quite" == totally/actually; | ||
"quiet" == low level of noise/silent. | "quiet" == low level of noise/silent. | ||
: (Hopefully) fixed. Why didn't you? -- [[User:Christian|chris_goe]] 20:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | : (Hopefully) fixed. Why didn't you? -- [[User:Christian|chris_goe]] 20:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Teach a man to fish, and all that ;) | |||
= Combined status page = | |||
Out of curiosity: why was the status page split up? Was it too long to be edited? Or, asked another way: is there a need for a combined status page, with '''all''' the statuses on one page, as before? This could be achived through article inclusion, e.g. | |||
<nowiki>{{:XFS_status_update_for_2012}}</nowiki> | |||
<nowiki>{{:XFS_status_update_for_2011}}</nowiki> | |||
:This would include the statuses from 2012 and 2011 on a single page, yet each year would still have its own page. -- [[User:Ckujau|Ckujau]] 21:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:43, 19 March 2012
quite/quiet[edit source]
Someone's annoyingly dyslexic: "quite" == totally/actually; "quiet" == low level of noise/silent.
- (Hopefully) fixed. Why didn't you? -- chris_goe 20:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Teach a man to fish, and all that ;)
Combined status page[edit source]
Out of curiosity: why was the status page split up? Was it too long to be edited? Or, asked another way: is there a need for a combined status page, with all the statuses on one page, as before? This could be achived through article inclusion, e.g.
{{:XFS_status_update_for_2012}}
{{:XFS_status_update_for_2011}}
- This would include the statuses from 2012 and 2011 on a single page, yet each year would still have its own page. -- Ckujau 21:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)