Ideas for XFS: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Future Directions for XFS | = Future Directions for XFS = | ||
Dave Chinner ideas: | Dave Chinner's ideas from 2008: | ||
* [[ Improving inode Caching ]] | * [[Improving inode Caching]] | ||
* [[ Improving Metadata Performance By Reducing Journal Overhead ]] | * [[Improving Metadata Performance By Reducing Journal Overhead]] | ||
* [[ Reliable Detection and Repair of Metadata Corruption ]] | * [[Reliable Detection and Repair of Metadata Corruption]] | ||
Other ideas: | Other ideas: | ||
* [[ Splitting project quota support from group quota support ]] | * [[Splitting project quota support from group quota support]] | ||
* [[Assigning project quota to a linux container]] | |||
* [[Quota check parallelization]] | |||
* [[Support discarding of unused sectors]] (status: completed) | |||
* Superblock flag for when 64-bit inodes are present (see [http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-May/041379.html xfs: regarding the inode64 mount option]) | |||
* Wishlist: Please integrate ''xfs_irecover'' or provide [http://www.who.is.free.fr/wiki/doku.php?id=recover inode recovery feature] | |||
* [[Host Aware SMR architecture]] |
Latest revision as of 00:05, 28 June 2015
Future Directions for XFS[edit | edit source]
Dave Chinner's ideas from 2008:
Other ideas:
- Support discarding of unused sectors (status: completed)
- Superblock flag for when 64-bit inodes are present (see xfs: regarding the inode64 mount option)
- Wishlist: Please integrate xfs_irecover or provide inode recovery feature