Talk:XFS Status Updates: Difference between revisions

Add topic
From xfs.org
New page: Someone's annoyingly dyslexic: "quite" == totally/actually; "quiet" == low level of noise/silent.
 
Ckujau (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= quite/quiet =
Someone's annoyingly dyslexic:
Someone's annoyingly dyslexic:
"quite" == totally/actually;
"quite" == totally/actually;
"quiet" == low level of noise/silent.
"quiet" == low level of noise/silent.
: (Hopefully) fixed. Why didn't you? -- [[User:Christian|chris_goe]] 20:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Teach a man to fish, and all that ;)
= Combined status page =
Out of curiosity: why was the status page split up? Was it too long to be edited? Or, asked another way: is there a need for a combined status page, with '''all''' the statuses on one page, as before? This could be achived through article inclusion, e.g.
<nowiki>{{:XFS_status_update_for_2012}}</nowiki>
<nowiki>{{:XFS_status_update_for_2011}}</nowiki>
:This would include the statuses from 2012 and 2011 on a single page, yet each year would still have its own page. -- [[User:Ckujau|Ckujau]] 21:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:43, 19 March 2012

quite/quiet[edit source]

Someone's annoyingly dyslexic: "quite" == totally/actually; "quiet" == low level of noise/silent.

(Hopefully) fixed. Why didn't you? -- chris_goe 20:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Teach a man to fish, and all that ;)

Combined status page[edit source]

Out of curiosity: why was the status page split up? Was it too long to be edited? Or, asked another way: is there a need for a combined status page, with all the statuses on one page, as before? This could be achived through article inclusion, e.g.

{{:XFS_status_update_for_2012}}
{{:XFS_status_update_for_2011}}
This would include the statuses from 2012 and 2011 on a single page, yet each year would still have its own page. -- Ckujau 21:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)