Ideas for XFS: Difference between revisions
m dunno who put the ida on this page, but I think s/he refers to http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-May/041379.html |
No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* [[ Support discarding of unused sectors ]] | * [[ Support discarding of unused sectors ]] | ||
* Superblock flag for when 64-bit inodes are present (see [http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-May/041379.html]) | * Superblock flag for when 64-bit inodes are present (see [http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-May/041379.html]) | ||
* WISH: Please integrate xfs_irecover or provide inode recovery feature : http://rzr.online.fr/q/recover |
Revision as of 00:04, 19 June 2011
Future Directions for XFS
Dave Chinner ideas:
Other ideas:
- Splitting project quota support from group quota support
- Assigning project quota to a linux container
- Support discarding of unused sectors
- Superblock flag for when 64-bit inodes are present (see [1])
- WISH: Please integrate xfs_irecover or provide inode recovery feature : http://rzr.online.fr/q/recover